🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have harvested millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them publicly.

Potential Boost for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers said the seeming leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for data to train their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its entire catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the nefarious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and employed questionable methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Stated Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the audio files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, said the breached music would likely be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to be used training AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own private free equivalent of the service”. He said it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner signals. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

A government minister for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.