🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's childhood". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to enact a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised parents to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement calling for a ban for minors unless guardian approval is provided. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" design of these services, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid first step," commented one parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Earlier, support built behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. One foundation set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and suitable for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the regional level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from various figures to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Apart from the West, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.